Rewarding Time “in Office”

Don Blohowiak has a new post on his “Leadership. Now.” blog titled “Endurance Reward” where he discusses the ‘old-timer, high salary’ issue within organizations. The main question of the article is:

If you exclude assessments of merit and value from determining the worth of longevity, why pay a premium for tenure?

I used to see this issue quite often within organizations, but haven’t run across a lot of the old-timers who are getting paid high salaries mainly because of their tenure….most of the highly paid, long-tenured employees have been sent into early retirement (or fired or let go in a lay off) in cost cutting measures.

I wonder, though, how organizations did (and still do?) justify paying someone a much higher salary just because they have more ‘time in the saddle’ than other similar employees. Anyone know the reasons behind this?

Technorati Tags: , ,

1 Comment
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Eric Brown
15 years ago

Erik – You have a good point. The cost of hiring and training a new employee may well be more than the incremental costs of keeping long-time employees…as long as those employees where doing their job and providing value to the company.

If you'd like to receive updates when new posts are published, signup for my mailing list. I won't sell or share your email.