Blog, Leadership, Management, Organization, Project Management

Results over Process

Timothy Johnson takes a swipe at methodologies in his post titled “Worshipping the Hammer“.  To be more accurate, he takes a swipe at those people who focus on process & methodology over results.  Timothy asks the following questions:

  • Are you spending more time arguing about process than you are about outcomes?
  • Are you posturing and positioning on methodology more than you are on results?

Powerful questions.

Timothy’s main argument of his post is that results should be considered over process.  Before thinking about the process/methodology that you will use, determine what the outcome(s) should be.  This is the same trap that many organizations fall into….to keep from falling into this trap, organizations should think about what they want to do before deciding how to do it.

As an example, consider the following scenario:

You’ve been tasked with reviewing your organization’s IT processes to find ways to make it more efficient.  What’s your first step?

Do you look for a methodology to use to make the organization more efficient?

Do you focus on on the process rather than the project?


Do you determine what ‘efficient’ really means?

Do you try to figure out what it means to be successful in the project?

Of course, my vote is for determining what you are trying to do and what does success means in the project.  Timothy suggests that many method-heads would argue for throwing a methodology at the problem first, which I’ve seen happen many times.

Also mentioned in Timothy’s post is his new book, which is apparently about systems thinking…a topic I find very interesting.  I’ve just begun re-reading The Fifth Discipline (the new release) and love some of the topics presented in that book so I’m looking forward to reading Timothy’s new book when published.

Tagged , , , , ,

About Eric D. Brown, D.Sc.

Eric D. Brown, D.Sc. is a data scientist, technology consultant and entrepreneur with an interest in using data and technology to solve problems. When not building cool things, Eric can be found outside with his camera(s) taking photographs of landscapes, nature and wildlife.
View all posts by Eric D. Brown, D.Sc. →
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
paul carroll
15 years ago

i love the concept of the milkshake moment because the lack of flexibility drives me crazy both as a consumer and as a writer/consultant. i’ll add a story to the mix: in 1990, give or take, steve ballmer and i had breakfast at a hotel in new york, when i was a reporter on the technology beat at the wall street journal. steve, whose weight tended to bounce all over the place, was on one of his periodic diets and ordered a bowl of rice. the waiter said that wasn’t on the menu. we were at a japanese hotel, so… Read more »


[…] tip: Speaking of processes that stray from purpose, please see this excellent discussion by Eric Brown of how to ask the right questions in order to arrive at the right […]

Eric D. Brown
15 years ago

Hi Paul – Thanks for the comment. Great story…thanks for sharing!

Stephen Rock
15 years ago

Good post. I have a slightly different perspective however. Perhaps it is just adding another “or.” I find the key question to ask is, “what is the boss’s boss’s objective?” Instead of playing the game of telephone and trying to guess the objective based on second or third-hand information, go to the source. Let me give an example. We were involved with a project to make an Accounts Payable organization more efficient. There was plenty of opportunities to change processes within Accounts Payable, but addressing these issues would not come close to satisfying the CFO’s needs. He wanted an organization… Read more »

Eric D. Brown
15 years ago

Hello Stephen,

Thanks for the comment…great stuff. You’ve got a great point…it is necessary to find out the real objective from the main source (e.g., your bosses boss).

You’ve got a great blog going at…I’ll be adding your feed to my daily reading.


[…] tip: Speaking of confusing cause and effect, please see this insightful piece, by Eric Brown, about results and process. Please also view this excellent article by Miki Saxon about “in the moment” […]

Timothy Johnson
15 years ago

Hi Stephen – I’ll echo Eric’s agreement (to a point). As a project manager, I’ve seen too many projects initiated by what I like to term “executive brainfart” – if the boss’s boss cannot point to a specific organizational problem or opportunity, does it really matter they are the boss’s boss? Yes, you want to satisfy your key stakeholders, but if they really don’t know what they want, aren’t you just chasing your tail and wasting organizational resources in the process?

Stephen Rock
15 years ago

Ah yes… A blogger’s dream – A comment war! Ok. I will bite. I will agree and disagree (to a point). If a boss’s boss cannot point to a specific organizational problem or opportunity, it makes them a bad leader or a bad communicator. It does not make them irrelevant. They get paid (and fired) for their vision – and their brainfarts. Project teams get paid (and fired) for their delivery against whatever the boss’s boss say. Some observations: – What seems like a brainfart may be, in fact, part of a high-caliber plan. The boss’s boss is hopefully advantaged… Read more »